How Exercise Could Lead To A Better Brain
Gretchen Reynolds, Columnist, NY Times
Gretchen Reynolds, Columnist, NY Times
The value of mental-training games may be speculative, as Dan Hurley writes in his article on the quest to make ourselves smarter,
but there is another, easy-to-achieve, scientifically proven way to
make yourself smarter. Go for a walk or a swim. For more than a decade,
neuroscientists and physiologists have been gathering evidence of the
beneficial relationship between exercise
and brainpower. But the newest findings make it clear that this isn’t
just a relationship; it is the relationship. Using sophisticated
technologies to examine the workings of individual neurons — and the
makeup of brain matter itself — scientists in just the past few months
have discovered that exercise appears to build a brain that resists
physical shrinkage and enhance cognitive flexibility. Exercise, the
latest neuroscience suggests, does more to bolster thinking than
thinking does.
The most persuasive evidence comes from several new studies of lab
animals living in busy, exciting cages. It has long been known that
so-called “enriched” environments — homes filled with toys and engaging,
novel tasks — lead to improvements in the brainpower of lab animals. In
most instances, such environmental enrichment also includes a running
wheel, because mice and rats generally enjoy running. Until recently,
there was little research done to tease out the particular effects of
running versus those of playing with new toys or engaging the mind in
other ways that don’t increase the heart rate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb9db/eb9db48a9e285f492a2faf4a9701ea68e8bb31cc" alt=""
So, last year a team of researchers led by Justin S. Rhodes, a
psychology professor at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and
Technology at the University of Illinois, gathered four groups of mice
and set them into four distinct living arrangements. One group lived in a
world of sensual and gustatory plenty, dining on nuts, fruits and
cheeses, their food occasionally dusted with cinnamon, all of it washed
down with variously flavored waters. Their “beds” were colorful plastic
igloos occupying one corner of the cage. Neon-hued balls, plastic
tunnels, nibble-able blocks, mirrors and seesaws filled other parts of
the cage. Group 2 had access to all of these pleasures, plus they had
small disc-shaped running wheels in their cages. A third group’s cages
held no embellishments, and they received standard, dull kibble. And the
fourth group’s homes contained the running wheels but no other toys or
treats.
All the animals completed a series of cognitive tests at the start of
the study and were injected with a substance that allows scientists to
track changes in their brain structures. Then they ran, played or, if
their environment was unenriched, lolled about in their cages for
several months.
Afterward, Rhodes’s team put the mice through the same cognitive tests
and examined brain tissues. It turned out that the toys and tastes, no
matter how stimulating, had not improved the animals’ brains.
“Only one thing had mattered,” Rhodes says, “and that’s whether they had
a running wheel.” Animals that exercised, whether or not they had any
other enrichments in their cages, had healthier brains and performed
significantly better on cognitive tests than the other mice. Animals
that didn’t run, no matter how enriched their world was otherwise, did
not improve their brainpower in the complex, lasting ways that Rhodes’s
team was studying. “They loved the toys,” Rhodes says, and the mice
rarely ventured into the empty, quieter portions of their cages. But
unless they also exercised, they did not become smarter.
Why would exercise build brainpower in ways that
thinking might not? The brain, like all muscles and organs, is a tissue,
and its function declines with underuse and age. Beginning in our late
20s, most of us will lose about 1 percent annually of the volume of the
hippocampus, a key portion of the brain related to memory and certain
types of learning.
Exercise though seems to slow or reverse the brain’s physical decay,
much as it does with muscles. Although scientists thought until recently
that humans were born with a certain number of brain cells and would
never generate more, they now know better. In the 1990s, using a
technique that marks newborn cells, researchers determined during
autopsies that adult human brains contained quite a few new neurons.
Fresh cells were especially prevalent in the hippocampus, indicating
that neurogenesis — or the creation of new brain cells — was primarily
occurring there. Even more heartening, scientists found that exercise
jump-starts neurogenesis. Mice and rats that ran for a few weeks
generally had about twice as many new neurons in their hippocampi as
sedentary animals. Their brains, like other muscles, were bulking up.
But it was the ineffable effect that exercise had on the functioning of
the newly formed neurons that was most startling. Brain cells can
improve intellect only if they join the existing neural network, and
many do not, instead rattling aimlessly around in the brain for a while
before dying.
One way to pull neurons into the network, however, is to learn
something. In a 2007 study, new brain cells in mice became looped into
the animals’ neural networks if the mice learned to navigate a water
maze, a task that is cognitively but not physically taxing. But these
brain cells were very limited in what they could do. When the
researchers studied brain activity afterward, they found that the newly
wired cells fired only when the animals navigated the maze again, not
when they practiced other cognitive tasks. The learning encoded in those
cells did not transfer to other types of rodent thinking.
Exercise, on the other hand, seems to make neurons nimble. When
researchers in a separate study had mice run, the animals’ brains
readily wired many new neurons into the neural network. But those
neurons didn’t fire later only during running. They also lighted up when
the animals practiced cognitive skills, like exploring unfamiliar
environments. In the mice, running, unlike learning, had created brain
cells that could multitask.
Just how exercise remakes minds on a molecular level is not yet fully
understood, but research suggests that exercise prompts increases in
something called brain-derived neurotropic factor, or B.D.N.F., a
substance that strengthens cells and axons, fortifies the connections
among neurons and sparks neurogenesis. Scientists can’t directly study
similar effects in human brains, but they have found that after
workouts, most people display higher B.D.N.F. levels in their
bloodstreams.
Few if any researchers think that more B.D.N.F. explains all of the
brain changes associated with exercise. The full process almost
certainly involves multiple complex biochemical and genetic cascades. A
recent study of the brains of elderly mice, for instance, found 117
genes that were expressed differently in the brains of animals that
began a program of running, compared with those that remained sedentary,
and the scientists were looking at only a small portion of the many
genes that might be expressed differently in the brain by exercise.
Whether any type of exercise will produce these desirable effects is
another unanswered and intriguing issue. “It’s not clear if the activity
has to be endurance exercise,” says the psychologist and neuroscientist
Arthur F. Kramer, director of the Beckman Institute at the University
of Illinois and a pre-eminent expert on exercise and the brain. A
limited number of studies in the past several years have found cognitive
benefits among older people who lifted weights for a year and did not
otherwise exercise. But most studies to date, and all animal
experiments, have involved running or other aerobic activities.
Whatever the activity, though, an emerging message from the most recent
science is that exercise needn’t be exhausting to be effective for the
brain. When a group of 120 older men and women were assigned to walking
or stretching programs for a major 2011 study, the walkers wound up with
larger hippocampi after a year. Meanwhile, the stretchers lost volume
to normal atrophy. The walkers also displayed higher levels of B.D.N.F.
in their bloodstreams than the stretching group and performed better on
cognitive tests.
In effect, the researchers concluded, the walkers had regained two years
or more of hippocampal youth. Sixty-five-year-olds had achieved the
brains of 63-year-olds simply by walking, which is encouraging news for
anyone worried that what we’re all facing as we move into our later
years is a life of slow (or not so slow) mental decline.
No comments:
Post a Comment